The Sustainability Professional’s Guide to Global Finance

The Sustainability Professional’s Guide to Global Finance

Introduction

By the end of 2025, the artificial partition that once separated the disciplines of “sustainability” and “finance” has not merely fractured; it has been dismantled entirely. For decades, sustainability professionals, comprising engineers, ecologists, atmospheric scientists, and policy experts, operated in a parallel sphere to the capital markets. One group communicated in the vernacular of carbon tonnes, social impact, and planetary boundaries; the other conversed in basis points, internal rates of return (IRR), and free cash flow. Today, these distinct lexicons have merged into a singular, cohesive dialect centred on risk, resilience, and value creation.

The landscape of 2025 is defined by a stark and unavoidable realisation: physical climate risks are no longer theoretical scenarios relegated to long-term horizons but are immediate, palpable financial liabilities. Simultaneously, the global transition to a Net Zero economy has revealed itself to be, fundamentally, a capital allocation challenge of unprecedented magnitude.1 The era of “green” functioning merely as a marketing label or a corporate social responsibility (CSR) add-on is over. It has been replaced by a ruthless, disciplined focus on financial materiality and asset resilience.

For the sustainability professional, this paradigm shift necessitates the acquisition of a new, sophisticated toolkit. It is no longer sufficient to design a decarbonisation strategy based solely on environmental merit or technical feasibility. To drive implementation in 2026, one must navigate the complex, often opaque machinery of global finance. This requires a nuanced understanding of how investors measure and price risk, how liquidity constraints shape portfolio construction, and where capital allocators seek returns in a volatile, transition-exposed world.

This report serves as an exhaustive guide to this new reality. It dissects the financial system of 2025, breaking down the asset classes, market mechanisms, and emerging trends that define the modern sustainability agenda. It explores why the “Greenium” has vanished from bond markets, why “Transition Alpha” has emerged as the primary objective for active managers, and how the physical realities of climate change, from copper supply deficits to AI-driven grid bottlenecks, are reshaping investment portfolios from Wall Street to Singapore.

The Core Concepts – The Investor’s Mindset

Before dissecting the specific nuances of asset classes, the sustainability professional must understand the three foundational levers that drive all investment decisions: Risk, Return, and Liquidity. In the financial environment of 2026, the definitions of these terms have evolved significantly to internalise climate dynamics and the transition economy.

1. Risk: The Integration of Physical and Transition Realities

Financial markets are, at their core, mechanisms for pricing risk. Historically, environmental factors were treated as “externalities”, risks that existed outside the balance sheet and were largely ignored in valuation models. In 2026, a combination of rigorous regulation, improved data granularity, and market forces has forced these risks “on-balance sheet.”

Physical Risk as Financial Reality

By 2025, the impact of physical climate change, manifesting as floods, heatwaves, wildfires, and storms, had shifted from long-term projection to immediate financial loss. Insured losses from extreme weather events reached approximately $140 billion in 2024 alone, with projections for 2025 exceeding $150 billion.3 This escalation has forced a re-evaluation of asset vulnerability.

For investors, physical risk is now a critical input in asset valuation. The integration of the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) scenarios into prudential stress tests, such as the European Banking Authority’s (EBA) 2025 adverse scenario, has formalised this link.1 Banks and asset managers are now required to assess how acute physical risks (e.g., a specific flood event) and chronic risks (e.g., rising sea levels or persistent heat stress) deplete capital reserves.

The NGFS scenarios utilised in 2025 stress tests revealed that acute physical risks could deplete Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratios by nearly 80 basis points in adverse scenarios.1 This capital depletion means banks have less money to lend, tightening credit conditions for vulnerable sectors. Furthermore, insurance market behavior serves as an early warning signal; coverage for specific climate-related perils in high-risk regions is increasingly being withdrawn or priced at prohibitive levels, effectively transferring risk back to the asset owner.3

The “Bluelining” Crisis The most acute manifestation of physical risk in 2026 is not merely the price of insurance, but its availability. Insurers, modelling hyper-local climate risks, are increasingly “bluelining”, effectively redlining entire postcodes prone to flooding or wildfires by withdrawing coverage entirely.

This is a systemic financial trigger. Most commercial real estate loans include covenants requiring the borrower to maintain “all-risk” insurance. If coverage is withdrawn, the borrower is technically in breach of covenant, allowing the bank to call in the loan or demand immediate repayment. For the sustainability professional, this elevates physical resilience measures (e.g., flood defenses) from an operational “nice-to-have” to a critical condition for debt viability.

The Sustainability Translation: When a sustainability professional proposes a flood defense system, a water recycling unit, or a heat-resistant building facade, they are not merely “adapting to climate change.” They are preserving the Net Asset Value (NAV) of the property and lowering the Discount Rate applied to its future cash flows. An asset exposed to unmitigated physical risk is valued lower because its future earnings are uncertain.3 The proposal is effectively a capital preservation strategy.

Transition Risk: The Cost of Obsolescence

Transition risk refers to the financial loss associated with the structural shift to a low-carbon economy, driven by policy changes, technological advancements, and shifting market preferences. In 2025, this is most visible in the “stranding” of assets. An asset becomes stranded when it loses its economic value before the end of its useful life because it can no longer operate legally or profitably in a decarbonised world.

The integration of transition plans into prudential supervision means that financial institutions must now evaluate their clients’ resilience to these shifts.2 A company without a credible transition plan is viewed as a high-risk borrower, facing higher interest rates or exclusion from capital markets entirely. This risk is amplified by the “anti-greenwashing” regulations in jurisdictions like the UK and EU, which require substantiation of transition claims.

2. Return: The Hunt for “Transition Alpha”

In the early 2020s, “green investing” often implied a passive strategy of holding low-carbon tech stocks or excluding fossil fuels. By 2026, the sophisticated investor seeks Transition Alpha.

“Alpha” in finance refers to the excess return of an investment relative to a benchmark index. Transition Alpha is the specific excess return generated by identifying companies that are leading the transition or, more lucratively, transforming “brown” (high-emitting) companies into “green” ones.5

The Value of Transformation

Investors have realised that divestment (selling dirty assets) does not solve the climate problem, it merely transfers the asset to another owner who may care less about emissions. The real value lies in stewardship and operational decarbonisation. Private equity firms and active managers are now buying undervalued industrial assets, cement plants, steel mills, older buildings, and deploying capital to decarbonise them. When these assets are re-sold as “green” or “transition-aligned” assets, they command a higher price. This valuation uplift is the Transition Alpha.7

For example, within the industrial sector, companies in electrical equipment, building products, and industrial conglomerates are identified as hidden “transition alpha” leaders.7 These firms provide the nuts and bolts of the transition, and their operational improvements yield returns that outperform the broader market.

  • Key Insight: Sustainability professionals are the architects of Transition Alpha. Their technical roadmaps for energy efficiency, electrification, and process engineering are the business plans that unlock this financial value.

3. Liquidity: The Illiquidity Premium in Green Infrastructure

Liquidity refers to how quickly an asset can be converted into cash without affecting its price. Public stocks are highly liquid; they can be sold in seconds. A wind farm, a hydrogen pipeline, or a retrofitted office building is highly illiquid; selling these assets can take months or years.

In 2026, a massive rotation of capital is occurring from public markets into private markets (Private Equity, Infrastructure, and Private Credit) to fund the energy transition. Investors in these assets cannot sell them easily, so they demand an Illiquidity Premium, an extra return to compensate for locking their capital away for 10 to 20 years.9

The Infrastructure Boom

The transition requires tangible assets, grids, batteries, pipes, and retrofits, that are inherently illiquid. Institutional investors (pension funds, insurers) are increasingly allocating capital to these “real assets” to capture stable, long-term cash flows and the illiquidity premium, which is expected to widen over the next five years.11 This creates a favourable environment for long-duration infrastructure projects that sustainability professionals often manage.

  • The Conflict: The demand for green assets has historically compressed returns (too much money chasing too few projects). However, as the supply of projects increases (e.g., offshore transmission tenders in 2025), this premium is stabilising, offering attractive opportunities for patient capital.12 Investors are explicitly looking to capture this illiquidity premium through infrastructure debt and equity, viewing it as a primary catalyst for investment alongside increased returns.9

Asset Classes Explained

The global financial system is segmented into distinct asset classes, each playing a specialised role in the transition. Understanding these distinct pools of capital allows the sustainability professional to target the right funding source for the right project.

1. Fixed Income (Debt): The Engine of the Transition

The bond market remains the largest pool of capital for climate solutions, with the labelled sustainable bond market reaching over $6.3 trillion in cumulative issuance by mid-2025.13

The “Greenium” Has Vanished

A defining feature of the 2026 market is the disappearance of the Greenium (Green Premium). Historically, issuers of green bonds could pay a slightly lower interest rate (yield) than issuers of standard bonds because investors were willing to pay more for the green label. This discount was often cited as the primary financial benefit of issuing green debt.

By 2025/2026, empirical data confirms that the Greenium has largely evaporated. Studies analyzing issuance data show the premium has shrunk to roughly -1 basis point or vanished entirely in secondary markets.14 In some cases, debut green bonds may still command a slight advantage (roughly 6 basis points), but the general market benefit has normalised.16

Why? The market is flooded with green issuances, normalising the product. It is no longer a scarcity play. Green bonds have migrated from niche offerings to standard tools for investment-grade corporations and sovereigns.17

The Implication is that companies can no longer justify green bonds solely on cost savings. Instead, they issue them for strategic signalling, access to a broader investor base, and to demonstrate resilience to transition risk.16 Investors now buy green bonds for risk management purposes rather than to subsidise the issuer.

The Rise of Transition Bonds

As the Greenium fades, Transition Bonds are emerging as a critical instrument for 2026. Unlike Green Bonds (which fund specific green projects like solar farms), Transition Bonds allow high-emitting sectors (steel, shipping, aviation) to raise capital for their decarbonisation journeys.18

The EU Green Bond Standard (EuGB) and UK regulations effective from late 2025 have provided a credible framework, reducing fears of “transition-washing”.19 These standards ensure that funds are used for activities that are aligned with the EU Taxonomy or credible transition pathways.

While Green Bonds still dominate (representing roughly 68% of issuance in Q2 2025), Transition Bonds are seeing surged interest as the market acknowledges that Net Zero cannot happen without fixing high-carbon industries.13 The UK Government’s Green Financing Framework updates in 2025 have further clarified eligible expenditures, excluding nuclear energy from older green gilts but setting the stage for broader transition financing.21

The Decline of Sustainability-Linked Bonds (SLBs)

Sustainability-Linked Bonds, where the interest rate rises if a company misses a KPI, have fallen out of favor. Issuance volumes have dropped significantly in 2024 and 2025, reaching their lowest quarterly issuance since 2021.22 Market participants have grown skeptical of the ambition of the targets and the complexity of the “step-up” mechanisms. Investors prefer the certainty of “Use of Proceeds” instruments (like Green Bonds) over the conditional nature of SLBs.18

2. Public Equity (Stocks): The Stewardship Arena

Public equity markets in 2026 are characterised by a deep transatlantic divide regarding ESG, influencing how sustainability strategies are pitched and valued.

The Anti-ESG Backlash and “Financial Materiality”

In the United States, the politicisation of “ESG” has led to a semantic and strategic shift. Terms like “ESG” are often avoided in corporate filings and investor calls, replaced by “Financial Materiality”.

By 2025, over 15 states, including Oklahoma, Texas, and Florida, had enacted anti-ESG laws, though many face legal and practical challenges. States like Arizona and Arkansas continued to introduce bills in the 2025 legislative sessions aimed at restricting ESG integration.23

Sustainability professionals in the US now frame climate action strictly as a fiduciary duty. A proposal to decarbonise is not presented as “good for the planet”; it is presented as “preserving long-term shareholder value against regulatory and physical shocks”.26 Asset managers like BlackRock emphasise that their stewardship policies are grounded in financial materiality, not social engineering.27

Support for “Environmental & Social” (E&S) shareholder proposals has dropped significantly (down nearly 40% in 2025 compared to 2024), as large asset managers focus strictly on proposals with clear financial merit rather than prescriptive micromanagement.28 Say-on-pay proposals, however, continue to receive high support (~91%), indicating that investors are selective, not indiscriminately hostile.28

The European Parallel: The Stagnation of the “Social” Taxonomy

While the US grapples with overt “Anti-ESG” legislation, Europe has experienced a quiet but significant pivot regarding the “S” in ESG. By 2026, the proposed EU Social Taxonomy has effectively stalled.

Regulators and market participants have conceded that unlike carbon, which has a universal unit (tonnes of CO2e), social metrics are culturally relative and difficult to quantify financially. Consequently, the market has shifted focus from a prescriptive “Social Taxonomy” to a risk-based approach centred on Minimum Safeguards.

For the investor, “Social” is no longer about positive impact scoring; it is about litigation risk and supply chain continuity. Compliance with the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) is the new floor. Investors are not looking for “socially good” companies; they are screening for companies that do not have forced labour in their solar supply chains, viewing human rights violations strictly as operational and reputational liabilities.

 

Small Cap vs. Large Cap

A significant trend in 2026 is the rotation toward Small and Mid-Cap stocks, particularly those involved in domestic industrial bases and climate technology in the US.

In terms of valuation, large-cap stocks (especially the “Magnificent Seven” tech giants) are viewed as expensive, with earnings growth slowing. In contrast, small caps are historically undervalued and poised for a renaissance.30

In terms of Climate Relevance small caps are often more domestically focused and include niche industrial players critical to the transition (e.g., specialised component manufacturers for the grid). As the US economy strengthens and policies like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and CHIPS Act continue to deploy capital, these smaller, nimble firms are expected to outperform in earnings growth.30

3. Private Equity (PE) & Venture Capital (VC): The Builders

Private markets are where the “real work” of the transition happens, free from the quarterly reporting pressures of public markets.

Private Equity: The Operational Decarbonisation Playbook

Private Equity (PE) has moved beyond simple sector exclusion. The dominant strategy in 2026 is Operational Decarbonisation.

PE firms acquire carbon-intensive assets in sectors like chemicals, manufacturing, or industrial. They then deploy “grey-to-green” playbooks, installing renewable energy, improving thermal efficiency, and electrifying processes.33

This is not philanthropy. By lowering the carbon intensity, the PE firm “de-risks” the asset, making it more attractive to future buyers (who may have Net Zero targets) and commanding a higher exit multiple.35 Firms like Apollo have developed dedicated platforms to drive this value creation across their portfolios, viewing decarbonisation as a lever for bottom-line growth.34

Venture Capital: The Shift to Deep Tech

The era of funding “climate software” (apps for carbon tracking) has peaked. The 2026 VC landscape is obsessed with Deep Tech and Hardware.

Investments are flowing into batteries, hydrogen electrolysis, industrial heat, and grid hardware. While software offers higher margins, hardware offers the emissions reductions required by law and physics. The focus has shifted from “growth at all costs” to “profitable scaling” of physical technologies.36

A persistent challenge is the “Valley of Death”, the funding gap between piloting a technology and building the first commercial factory. VC funds are often too small for this capex-heavy phase. To bridge this, “braided capital” structures are emerging, blending philanthropic/concessionary capital (catalytic) with traditional VC and private credit to de-risk these hardware projects.38 New funds targeting $100–200 million rounds are specifically designed to help companies cross this chasm.38

Private Credit: The New Powerhouse

As banks face stricter capital requirements and pressure to decarbonise loan books, Private Credit (non-bank lenders) has stepped in to finance the transition.

Private credit funds are increasingly financing, hard to abate, complex projects in steel or aviation that traditional banks might shun due to rigidity or reputational fear.

Major players like Apollo and Standard Chartered have formed multi-billion dollar partnerships (e.g., a $3 billion agreement in early 2025) to channel private credit into clean transition and infrastructure projects. These partnerships combine a bank’s origination network with a private credit fund’s flexible capital to finance the “global industrial renaissance”.41

4. Real Assets: The Physical Front line

Real Assets, Real Estate and Infrastructure, are the tangible battleground of the transition.

Real Estate: Brown Discounts and Green Premiums

In commercial real estate (CRE), the market has bifurcated based on sustainability performance.

Brown Discount: Buildings with poor energy ratings (e.g., EPC ratings of E, F, or G) are trading at significant discounts (10–20%). They face “liquidity risk”, investors simply won’t buy them because the cost to retrofit them to meet 2030 standards is too high.43

Green Premium: While some argue the green premium is normalising, high-performing buildings still command higher rents and occupancy rates due to tenant demand for Net Zero aligned headquarters.45

CRREM Analysis: The Carbon Risk Real Estate Monitor (CRREM) remains the global standard for assessing stranding risk. In 2025, CRREM updated its terminology from “Stranding Year” to “Misalignment Year” to reflect that assets can be retrofitted, but the financial warning signal remains acute for any asset exceeding its carbon budget.47

Infrastructure: The AI-Energy Conflict

The most explosive trend in 2025 is the collision between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Net Zero.

AI data centres power demand is massive, they are consuming unprecedented amounts of electricity. The IEA projects data centre energy consumption to double by 2026.48 This demand is crashing into a constrained grid. In regions like Ireland and parts of the US, new data centres are being refused connection or facing multi-year delays. In Ireland, data centres already consume over 22% of national electricity.49

This crisis drives massive investment into Grid Modernisation and Clean Power. Infrastructure funds are pouring billions into transmission lines, battery storage, and “behind-the-meter” generation (e.g., a data centre with its own solar+battery setup).9 Hyperscalers are acting as the new anchor tenants for clean energy, driving demand for nuclear and geothermal power.52

5. Commodities: The Raw Materials of Transition

The energy transition is a materials transition. Moving from fossil fuels to renewables moves the economy from being fuel-intensive to mineral-intensive.

The Supply Crunch: Copper, Lithium, Nickel

Copper: Often called the “metal of electrification,” copper faces a severe supply deficit by 2026. Demand from EVs, wind farms, and AI data centers is outstripping mine supply. New mines take 15+ years to permit, creating a structural shortage that threatens to slow the transition. Goldman Sachs forecasts indicate a deficit exceeding half a million tons, creating upward price pressure.50

Lithium: The market balance is volatile. After a surplus in 2023-2024 driven by supply ramp-ups, forecasts for 2026 diverge. Some analysts predict a return to deficit as Energy Storage Systems (ESS) demand accelerates, potentially creating shortages of battery-grade lithium hydroxide.55

Nickel: Indonesia controls the global nickel supply (approx. 60%), leading to a surplus. However, the government plans production cuts in 2026 to manage prices, highlighting the geopolitical risks of green mineral supply chains.58

The Regulatory Trade Barrier: The 2027 CBAM Cliff-Edge

While supply deficits drive commodity prices up, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is redefining the cost of accessing the UK and EU markets. For sustainability professionals, 2026 is the final preparatory window before the UK’s mechanism goes live.

The UK Divergence Unlike the EU CBAM, which began a transitional phase in 2023, the UK CBAM is set for implementation in January 2027 with a distinct scope. Crucially, the UK mechanism includes glass and ceramics, sectors previously excluded from the initial EU scope, while excluding electricity.

For asset managers and industrial clients, this creates a complex compliance landscape. A “CBAM Liability” calculation is now a mandatory component of supply chain diligence. Importing steel for a London development or ceramic tiles for a retrofit project will carry a direct carbon price surcharge if the embedded emissions exceed domestic benchmarks. The “free allocation” of allowances is being phased out, meaning the cost of carbon is moving from a theoretical reporting metric to a line item on the procurement ledger.

Digital Product Passports (DPP)

To manage the ethics and circularity of these materials, the EU has introduced the Digital Product Passport.

This battery regulation comes into force on February 18, 2027, every EV and industrial battery in the EU must have a digital passport containing data on its chemistry, carbon footprint, and recycled content.60

This means that In 2026, the entire automotive supply chain is scrambling to implement the data infrastructure for this. The passport requires a QR code linking to a secure database, creating a massive compliance burden but also an opportunity for traceability technology.62

Emerging & Niche Concepts

Beyond the traditional asset classes, 2025 has seen the maturation of nature-based financial instruments.

The Carbon Market Bifurcation:

The Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) of 2025 bears little resemblance to the market of the early 2020s. Following the implementation of the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market’s (ICVCM) Core Carbon Principles (CCPs), the market has violently bifurcated.

The Integrity Premium “Junk” offsets, historic renewable energy projects or avoided deforestation credits lacking rigorous baselines, are now effectively stranded assets, trading at near-zero value. Corporate buyers, wary of greenwashing litigation, have abandoned them.

Capital has rotated exclusively into High-Integrity Credits and Permanent Removals (e.g., Biochar, Direct Air Capture). These credits command a massive premium, reflecting their quality and scarcity. For the sustainability professional, the advice to finance teams is clear: buying cheap offsets is no longer a hedging strategy; it is a reputational liability. The strategy for 2026 is “reduction first, removal second,” with offset portfolios subjected to the same due diligence as any other financial asset.

Biodiversity and Natural Capital

Nature is no longer just “nice to have”; it is an investable asset class.

Biodiversity Credits, a distinct from carbon credits, these represent a unit of biodiversity “uplift” (e.g., restoring a hectare of wetland). While the market is still small compared to carbon, it is gaining traction with frameworks like the Global Biodiversity Framework (Target 19) aiming to mobilise $200 billion/year.64

Australia launched the world’s first national, voluntary Nature Repair Market in 2025. This allows landholders to generate tradable certificates for biodiversity projects, creating a new revenue stream for farmers and conservationists. The market formally launched with its first methodology in early 2025, allowing projects to register from March 1, 2025.66

Debt-for-Nature Swaps

This sovereign debt instrument has evolved from a niche charity tool to a mainstream financial restructuring mechanism.

A country (often in the Global South) refinances its expensive commercial debt at a lower interest rate (often with a guarantee from a multilateral bank like the IDB or DFC). The savings are ring-fenced for nature conservation.

In late 2024/early 2025, The Bahamas closed a $300 million swap to fund ocean conservation, recognised as a landmark ESG deal. Ecuador also completed a massive swap for the Amazon.68

Critics argue that these swaps are complex, opaque, and offer relatively small debt relief compared to full restructuring, but they remain a popular tool for nations rich in biodiversity but poor in cash.71

The 2026 “Cheatsheet” for Sustainability Professionals

To effectively communicate with finance teams, sustainability professionals must translate their work into the language of the CFO.

Sustainability Concept

Financial Translation (2026)

Why Finance Cares

Decarbonisation

De-risking / Resilience

Lowers the cost of capital; prevents asset stranding.

Physical Climate Risk

CapEx Liability / Insurance Risk

Directly impacts future cash flows and asset valuation.

Scope 3 Emissions

Supply Chain Volatility

Exposure to upstream carbon taxes and disruption.

Biodiversity Loss

Systemic / Operational Risk

Threatens raw material supply (e.g., agriculture, water).

Double Materiality

Regulatory Compliance (EU)

Mandatory reporting under CSRD; determines legal liability.

Green Premium

Market Access / Liquidity

Ensures the asset can be sold to the widest pool of buyers.

The Strategic Takeaway

The “sustainability” conversation in 2026 is a “capital allocation” conversation. Investors are not looking for moral victories; they are looking for risk-adjusted returns.

  • In the EU: The focus is on Compliance and Double Materiality. You must report impacts on the world because the law (CSRD, SFDR) demands it.72
  • In the US: The focus is on Financial Materiality and Opportunity. You must prove that sustainability initiatives protect the bottom line or capture new growth (e.g., IRA tax credits, AI power solutions).26

For the sustainability professional, the goal is to position every project, whether it’s a new battery plant, a mangrove restoration, or a grid upgrade, as a vehicle for Transition Alpha. You are not just saving the planet; you are building the resilient, high-value assets of the future economy.

 

References

  1. Integrating climate risk into the 2025 EU-wide stress test: the effects of climate risks for firms, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/financial-stability-publications/macroprudential-bulletin/html/ecb.mpbu202511_04.en.html
  2. From sustainability to stability: Transition plans enter the prudential agenda, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.unepfi.org/news/from-sustainability-to-stability-transition-plans-enter-the-prudential-agenda/
  3. Understanding Physical Climate Risks in Portfolios – Mercer, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.mercer.com/insights/investments/investing-sustainably/understanding-physical-climate-risks-in-portfolios/
  4. Real Estate Climate Risk Premium – AEW Capital Management, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.aew.com/research/real-estate-climate-risk-premium
  5. Download, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.alphanetworks.com/uploads/csrdownloaden/689574a0cdefb.pdf
  6. Equity Strategies for a Net Zero Economy | Dhanam Prabawa Holdings, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://dhanamprabawa.wixsite.com/dhanamprabawa/general-clean
  7. EU Taxonomy Navigator 3.0 – DNB, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://content.dnb.no/docs/9398840/esg-eu-taxonomy-navigator-3-181225.pdf
  8. Silver: where beauty meets conductivity – Lombard Odier Investment Managers, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://am.lombardodier.com/contents/news/investment-viewpoints/2024/may/1179-MAR-silver.html
  9. Landmark new research reveals private equity and infrastructure top unlisted investment picks | IFM Investors, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.ifminvestors.com/news-and-insights/media-centre/landmark-new-research-reveals-private-equity-and-infrastructure-top-unlisted-investment-picks/
  10. The Alternative Outlook for 2025 | Natixis Investment Managers, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.im.natixis.com/en-latam/insights/alternatives/2025/the-alternative-outlook-for-2025
  11. Q3 2025 | Highlights | KKR, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.kkr.com/content/dam/kkr/insights/pdf/global-wealth-investment-playbook-highlights-3q25.pdf
  12. The prospects for infrastructure debt in 2025 – Aviva Investors, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.avivainvestors.com/en-gb/views/aiq-investment-thinking/2025/01/infrastructure-debt-value/
  13. Labeled Sustainable Bonds – Market Update – July 2025 – The World Bank, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/9a258e226b80204053eabdd50ed1bc08-0340012025/original/Labeled-Bond-Quarterly-Newsletter-Issue-No-12.pdf
  14. European financial green bonds: yield and impact go hand in hand – GAM.com, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.gam.com/en/our-thinking/outlook-2026/atlanticomnium-climate-bond
  15. The good, the bad, the opportunities: green bonds in 2025 | AXA IM Corporate, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.axa-im.com/sustainability/insights/good-bad-opportunities-green-bonds-2025
  16. ESG Strategist – Investigating commonly-cited factors of the greenium – ABN AMRO, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.abnamro.com/research/en/our-research/esg-strategist-investigating-commonly-cited-factors-of-the-greenium
  17. No More Greenium: What the Vanishing Green Bond Premium Means for Sustainable Finance – Nordic ESG Lab, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://nordicesglab.cbs.dk/no-more-greenium-what-the-vanishing-green-bond-premium-means-for-sustainable-finance/
  18. Global Sustainable Bond Issuance To Hold Steady At $1 Trillion In 2025, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/250205-sustainability-insights-global-sustainable-bond-issuance-to-hold-steady-at-1-trillion-in-2025-s13402934
  19. The European green bond standard – Supporting the transition – Finance, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/tools-and-standards/european-green-bond-standard-supporting-transition_en
  20. UK transition plans: A chance to drive sustainable finance at scale – IEEFA, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://ieefa.org/resources/uk-transition-plans-chance-drive-sustainable-finance-scale
  21. UK Government Green Financing Framework 2025 – GOV.UK, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6925b8119fd433badebc3171/E03494062_UK_Government_Green_Financing_Framework_2025_WEB_ACCESSIBLE.pdf
  22. ESG Finance Report – AFME, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.afme.eu/media/5ubftr3y/esgfinancereport1q25.pdf
  23. State legislative approaches opposing ESG investing – Ballotpedia, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://ballotpedia.org/State_legislative_approaches_opposing_ESG_investing
  24. States That are Pro or Anti ESG Investing – Natural Investments, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://naturalinvestments.com/states-for-or-against-esg-investing/
  25. Anti-ESG Crusade in US Sweeps 15 States With More Laws in Works | BloombergNEF, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://about.bnef.com/insights/finance/anti-esg-crusade-in-us-sweeps-15-states-with-more-laws-in-works/
  26. 2025 Benchmark Policy Guidelines United States – Glass Lewis, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://resources.glasslewis.com/hubfs/2025%20Guidelines/2025%20US%20Benchmark%20Policy%20Guidelines.pdf
  27. 2025 Global Voting Spotlight | BlackRock, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/publication/2025-investment-stewardship-voting-spotlight.pdf
  28. 2025 Proxy Season Review: Four Key Takeaways, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/06/2025-proxy-season-review-four-key-takeaways/
  29. 2025 Proxy Season: Why Consistency Matters in a Changing Landscape, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.calvert.com/insights/articles/calvert-2025-proxy-voting-review.html
  30. Why Small- and Mid-Cap Stocks Deserve Attention – American Century Investments, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.americancentury.com/insights/small-cap-mid-cap-stocks-2025/
  31. 2025 Outlook: Small Caps Provide Cost-Effective Exposure to Strong US Economy – Schroders, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.schroders.com/en-us/us/individual/insights/2025-outlook-small-caps-offer-an-inexpensive-way-to-gain-exposure-to-the-robust-us-economy/
  32. Are Small Caps Next in Line to Shine? – Russell Investments, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://russellinvestments.com/content/ri/ca/en/insights/russell-research/2025/07/small-caps-next-in-line.html
  33. Pathways to Commercial Liftoff: Decarbonising Chemicals & Refining – Climate Program Portal, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://climateprogramportal.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20230921-Pathways-to-Commercial-Liftoff-Chemicals-Refining.pdf
  34. Building Better Businesses: How Apollo Equity Helps Drive Value Through Portfolio Company Decarbonisation, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.apollo.com/content/dam/apolloaem/documents/insights/decarbonization-whitepaper-august-2024.pdf
  35. SUSTAINABILITY REPORT VOLUME 16 – PCAF, accessed on January 4, 2026, http://carbonaccountingfinancials.com/files/institutions_downloads/apollo-2024-sustainability-report-june-2025.pdf
  36. US Climate Tech Investment Achieves Six Straight Months of Growth; Silicon Valley Bank Releases Annual Report, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.svb.com/news/company-news/us-climate-tech-investment-achieves-six-straight-months-of-growth-silicon-valley-bank-releases-annual-report/
  37. State of Climate Tech Q3 2025: Capital Selectivity Defines a Maturing Market, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://netzeroinsights.com/resources/state-of-climate-tech-q3-2025/
  38. $60B Venture Capital Alliance Backs $300M Fund for Climate-Tech Startups, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://carboncredits.com/60b-venture-capital-alliance-backs-300m-fund-for-climate-tech-startups/
  39. Braiding capital to bridge climate tech’s ‘Valley of Death’ – ImpactAlpha, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://impactalpha.com/braiding-capital-to-bridge-climate-techs-valley-of-death/
  40. Explainer: The “Valley of Death” and the Challenges of Scaling Climate Tech, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://cleanenergyforum.yale.edu/2022/03/28/explainer-the-valley-of-death-and-the-challenges-of-scaling-climate-tech
  41. Apollo and Standard Chartered eye $3bn for ‘unprecedented capital market opportunity’, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.infrastructureinvestor.com/apollo-and-standard-chartered-eye-3bn-for-unprecedented-capital-market-opportunity/
  42. Apollo and Standard Chartered Form US$3B Financing Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Energy Transition Credit, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.apollo.com/insights-news/pressreleases/2025/01/apollo-and-standard-chartered-form-us-3b-financing-partnership-for-global-infrastructure-and-energy-transition-credit-3009228
  43. The sustainable asset advantage: unlocking value for a green future – JLL, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.jll.com/en-us/insights/the-sustainable-asset-advantage-unlocking-value-for-a-green-future
  44. ANALYSIS: The hidden cost of inaction—brown discounts in CRE – Building Atlas, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.buildingatlas.io/insights/analysis-the-hidden-cost-of-inactionbrown-discounts-in-cre
  45. Green Premiums, Brown Discounts: The Commercial Value of Sustainability in Real Estate, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://noda.ai/insights/green-premiums-brown-discounts
  46. Retail investment: green premium or brown discount? – Savills, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.savills.com/ReimaginingRetail/retail-investment-green-premium-or-brown-discount/
  47. CRREM Foundation Updates Terminology – Nareit, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.reit.com/news/blog/nareit-developments/crrem-foundation-updates-terminology
  48. IEA Study Sees AI, Cryptocurrency Doubling Data Center Energy Consumption by 2026, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/energy/article/33038469/iea-study-sees-ai-cryptocurrency-doubling-data-center-energy-consumption-by-2026
  49. The AI energy challenge: How to scale responsibly and win, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/12/net-positive-ai-energy-2030/
  50. Investing in the infrastructure of modern society | McKinsey, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/infrastructure/our-insights/the-infrastructure-moment
  51. Can US infrastructure keep up with the AI economy? – Deloitte, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/power-and-utilities/data-center-infrastructure-artificial-intelligence.html
  52. The data center report we promise you haven’t read – CTVC by Sightline Climate, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.ctvc.co/the-data-center-report-we-promise-you-havent-read/
  53. Copper Volatility Cant Detract From Broader Supply-Demand Pressures – Insurance News, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/copper-volatility-cant-detract-from-broader-supply-demand-pressures
  54. The global copper market is entering an age of extremely large deficits – MINING.COM, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.mining.com/the-global-copper-market-is-entering-an-age-of-extremely-large-deficits/
  55. Lithium Prices Surge Amid Strong Demand Forecasts, Could Reach Up to $28,000/Ton by 2026 – CarbonCredits.com, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://carboncredits.com/lithium-prices-surge-amid-strong-demand-forecasts-could-reach-up-to-28000-ton-by-2026-nili/
  56. Brenton Saunders: Why the lithium tide is set to turn in 2026 | Pendal Group, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://pendalgroup.com/education-and-resources/brenton-saunders-why-the-lithium-tide-is-set-to-turn-in-2026
  57. A tale of a looming surplus in the lithium industry: sticky supply to stay? | Wood Mackenzie, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/a-tale-of-a-looming-surplus-in-the-lithium-industry-sticky-supply-to-stay/
  58. Nickel Prices Jump After Top Producer Indonesia Signals 2026 Output Cut, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.ecofinagency.com/news/3112-51714-nickel-prices-jump-after-top-producer-indonesia-signals-2026-output-cut
  59. Indonesia’s Nickel Supply Management Transforms Global Market Dynamics 2026, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://discoveryalert.com.au/market-forces-indonesia-nickel-supply-management-2026/
  60. Digital Product Passports in the EU – Comprehensive Expansion under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation and what can be learnt from the Battery Passport Pilot – Hogan Lovells, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.hoganlovells.com/en/publications/digital-product-passports-in-the-eu-comprehensive-expansion
  61. EU Battery Regulation Updates – Reverse Logistics Group, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://rev-log.com/eu-battery-regulation-updates/
  62. Battery Passport Content Guidance, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://thebatterypass.eu/wp-content/uploads/q-a_content-guidance.pdf
  63. Digital Product Passport & Battery Passport Implementation Guide | Informatica, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.informatica.com/resources/articles/digital-product-passport-battery-passport-guide.html
  64. Biodiversity Finance Factbook – Bloomberg Professional Services, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/44/Biodiversity-Finance-Factbook-COP30-Edition.pdf
  65. Biodiversity Finance Factbook – Bloomberg Professional Services, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/Biodiversity-Finance-Factbook_COP16.pdf
  66. Nature Repair Market, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://cdn.environment.sa.gov.au/landscape/docs/ny/Nature-Repair-Market_fact-sheet.pdf
  67. Ready, set, launch: Australia’s world-first Nature Repair Market is now operational – KWM, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.kwm.com/au/en/insights/latest-thinking/ready-set-launch-australias-world-first-nature-repair-market-is-now-operational.html
  68. Debt For Nature Swap Hailed As ESG Deal of Year – The Bahama Journal, accessed on January 4, 2026, http://jonesbahamas.com/debt-for-nature-swap-hailed-as-esg-deal-of-year/
  69. Bahamas Unlocks $124 Million for Ocean Protection via Debt Swap – ESG News, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://esgnews.com/bahamas-unlocks-124-million-for-ocean-protection-via-debt-swap/
  70. Ecuador’s Debt-for-Nature Swap: A Small Deal, powerful message – Climate Policy Lab, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.climatepolicylab.org/communityvoices/2025/1/16/ecuadors-debt-for-nature-swap-a-small-deal-powerful-message
  71. Debt-for-nature swaps reduce debt seven times less than debt restructurings – Debt Justice, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://debtjustice.org.uk/press-release/debt-for-nature-swaps-reduce-debt-seven-times-less-than-debt-restructurings
  72. Double Materiality: A New Standard for Corporate Transparency and Accountability, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.esgreportinghub.org/article/double-materiality-a-new-standard-for-corporate-transparency-and-accountability
  73. 10 pitfalls companies should avoid when conducting a CSRD-aligned double materiality assessment – PwC, accessed on January 4, 2026, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/services/esg/library/csrd-double-materiality.html
Tags: , , ,